Il giorno mer 10 feb 2021 alle ore 19:51 Lars Wendler < polynomia...@gentoo.org> ha scritto:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:57:48 +0200 Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >I'm announcing a new project here - "binhost" > > > >"The Gentoo Binhost project aims to provide readily installable, > >precompiled packages for a subset of configurations, via central > >binary package hosting. Currently we are still in the conceptual > >planning stage. " > > > >https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Binhost > > > >If you're interested in helping out, feel free to add yourself on the > >wiki page. > > > >Note that I see actually *building* the packages not as the central > >point of the project (that could be e.g. a side effect of a > >tinderbox). I'm more concerned about > >* what configurations should we use > >* what portage features are still needed or need improvements (e.g. > >binpkg signing and verification) > >* how should hosting look like > >* and how we can test this on a limited scale before it goes "into > >production" > >* ... > > > >Comments, ideas, flamebaits? :D > > > >Cheers, > >Andreas > > > > It would be great to improve portage speed with handling binpkgs. I > already have my own binhost for a couple of Gentoo systems and even > though these systems don't have to compile anything themselves, > installing ~100 to ~200 binpkgs takes way more than an hour of > installation time. Arch Linux' pacman only takes a fraction of this > time for the very same task. > I know that I compare apples with pears here but even reducing the > current portage time by 50% would be a huge improvement. > > Agreed, nowadays I do use Gentoo in two ways: - From binpkgs usually for baremetal, server or desktop - condensing part of the system in a squashfs image, usually for containers Binpkg performance is acceptable albeit not blazing fast for machines with 500-800 packages (usually server) while for desktops which easily have 2000 packages the time to update can be hours. While we are here the squashfs images way to distribute is wonderful and handy, except that it's read-only and managing /etc is more challenging without the commodity of etc-update/dispatch-conf, would be nicer to have a comparable tool to be used for this. Suggestions about the implementation well accepted Cheers, Francesco (vivo) Riosa
