On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 1:31 PM Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Again, I don't understand why you continue escalating this. I have > already indicated that I'm fine with adding an option to disable this, > given that 1) the current behavior remains the default, and 2) people > are given big fat warning that they are now responsible for updating > their users (and ideally 3) the eclass tells user how to update > the user). I've just asked for the option to override values via > make.conf goes first since that is the preferred solution that doesn't > destroy the foundations of GLEP 81. > > floppym has indicated an interest in this, so I've presumed he's going > to submit an updated patch to the ml.
Sorry, I didn't mean to give that impression. I do not have any plans to submit patches myself. I asked if you would accept a similar patch to clarify your position for others (including Whissi) who may want to contribute.
