On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 08:21:39 CET Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used in case of compile failures and test failures. > There are also some documented limitations. > > If there aren't much commits, usually you get the bug after 30 minutes after > the commit and this looks to be nice. > > Since there are conflicting opinions I would like to know if you find it > useful or not. > > More info about the project here: > https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2020/07/04/gentoo-tinderbox/ > > Please keep me CC'ed > > Thank you > Agostino
Thanks all for the feedback. What looks strange is that ci/tinderbox opened ~4700 bugs, sure, there are invalid/duplicate bugs but the majority are fixed so in my opinion they were useful, but looking at the mailing list feedback looks to be a completely crap. I want to play the game of destructive people but in a constructive way. Thanks to @gyakovlev for the idea I have opened a new github project where we can collect the requests and the bugs: https://github.com/asarubbo/ci/issues An important note: I consider this 'project' as something related to QA ( if you have a different opinion feel free to say ), so since I received rant from developers for something requested by other developers, I will touch the code ONLY when there is the QA lead approval. When you want a new feature or you want to modify something that already exists, please open a thread (gentoo-dev is fine, and thanks to bman for the tracking idea) and open a github issue only when there is a written track of the QA lead approval mentioned above. There is a README into the repository that explains all class of bugs discovered by the CI system. Thank you Agostino
