On 11/6/20 9:21 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used in case of compile failures and test failures. > There are also some documented limitations. Would it be possible for "someone" to figure it out, if you made your tinderbox scripts/code public? ;) Hate to say it, but toralf does pretty good job here, so it could be better.
> Since there are conflicting opinions I would like to know if you find it > useful or not. Yes, I do find your tinderbox work useful most of the time. Thanks! However the latest, ehh, show with DISTUTILS_USE_SETUPTOOLS has made people do *hundreds* of commits that now apparently need a fixing anyway, or reverting back, and that doesn't feel nice. Sure maybe the eclass could do some fixing too, but maybe this notice wasn't meant to be full-tree scanned (at least _yet_). From my point of view your work is, and has been, appreciated, but you could coordinate better with other people. Hate to say it again, but toralf does seems to do a better job here too in that regard. Unless you're fine with comparing tinderboxers. With toralf's logs it's easy to reproduce the whole environment leading to a build failure, while with yours it's just build.log, thay may or may not be enough to find the build-breaking issue. -- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
