On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:27:51PM -0700, Christopher Head wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor do > > I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that fact. 15 > > vs 30 days doesn't seem worth squabbling over. > > Not that I care about this specific case, but isn’t the 30-day time > period also meant as a nice long warning time for people *using* the > package to give them time to migrate to something else before it starts > to be unsupported, potentially break the depgraph, no longer be > installable on additional systems, and so on? > -- > Christopher Head
That perspective opens a new potential bikeshed. I doubt anyone wants to have anotehr Py2 removal debate... Of course, the depgraph is not an issue. If a package is masked, it will break immediately. Hence, required checks are run then the package is masked. -- Cheers, Aaron
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
