On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 16:34 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > The pull-based mirroring is a bit sad, as it would be nice to auto-update > some forks, but it's not a killer feature.
Exactly. Especially that our push-based mirroring is better, and I think that's how we want to populate it. > I think our new SSO solution > could potentially be a fix for the auth subsystems, but more work there > will be needed. I think SSO should be the primary login to our GitLab, especially for our users. GitHub login is a must. > Another major issue is operating the software. I haven't found anyone to > *run* gitlab; I'm not eager to do it. Today Gentoo is mostly distributed, > bugs are in bugzilla, wiki is on mediawiki, code is on gitolite with N > mirrors, email and lists are separate, etc. In a world where bugs, wiki, > code, ci, containers, PRs, are all on gitlab and it breaks and we can't fix > it; it will be bad news for all of those things. If the bugzilla machine > breaks we lose bugzilla; if gitlab breaks we lose the ability to edit the > wiki, file bugs, commit, run CI, etc. > But who says we want to migrate them all into GitLab? I thought our primary goal was to replace today's GitHub use, i.e. provide an alternative pipeline for pull/merge requests. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
