On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on. > > Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code > review / pull reqs, CI services, and deploy services.) Some of these are > piecemeal (e.g. gerrit has code review, zuul has CI) and gitea offers > repo-hosting but CI is separate (e.g. drone.) > > On the infra-side, I think we are pretty happy with repo-hosting (gitolite) > and repo-serving (gitweb). We are missing a CI piece and a pull-request > piece. Most of the users using PRs use either a gitlab or github mirror. > > I think the value of CI is pretty obvious to me (and I see tons of use > cases in Infra.) We could easily build CI into our current repository > solution (e.g. gitolite.) However gitolite doesn't really support PRs in a > uniform way and so CI is mostly for submitted code; similar to the existing > ::gentoo repo CI offered by mgorny. > > If we build a code review solution (like gitea / gerrit) would people use > it? Would you use it if you couldn't merge (because the code review > solution can't gpg sign your commits or merges) so a tool like the existing > pram tool would be needed to merge? >
Does GitLab count? Gerrit is just PITA. I think we had some concerns about Gitea, so I'd like to test it before deciding. GitLab OTOH works just fine for a lot of projects, and seems the next best thing after GitHub. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
