W dniu pią, 06.07.2018 o godzinie 08∶40 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Fri, 06 Jul 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > > Did you even read the text? It's 'at most 2 years'. If you renew it > > every year, you can achieve the desired effect while keeping far > > ahead of the required schedule. > > So effectively we're down from 5 years to 1 year also for the main > key, as a mandatory requirement? That is not what I have perceived > as the consensus in the discussion so far.
No, effectively we have 2 years unless developers are picky, in which
case it's their problem and not mine.
> > I really see no point in added complexity just so that someone could
> > bend the standard to the limits.
>
> It isn't complicated in the current version of GLEP 63 ("5 years
> maximum").
5 years is insane.
> Simply keep that wording, or moderately shorten it, to
> something like 3 years, or 2.25 years. (Or if you prefer round
> numbers, 800 days, or 70000000 seconds.) :-)
>
If I do it 3 years, you're going to complain that now you have to update
it every 2 years because it's not 3 years + 2 weeks...
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
