>>>>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > How about this then:
> | This specification currently defines one section: ``[structure]``. > | This section defines one or more repository structure definitions > | using non-negative sequential integer keys. The definition with > | the ``0`` key is the most preferred structure. The package manager > | should ignore any formats it does not recognize. If this section > | is not present, the package manager should behave as if only ``flat`` > | structure were specified. > I don't want people to skip numbers, and I want to avoid confusion > between 0/1 as initial number. I believe "sequential" is still somewhat ambiguous, and I wouldn't split "non-negative integer" which is a technical term. How about "consecutive non-negative integer keys"? Ulrich
pgpBqVOUtkeNv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
