On 18/09/17 16:36, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 14:28:37 CEST schrieb M. J. Everitt: >> <snip> >> >> Would a virtual help any? Probably overlooking a good number of factors, >> but wasn't mentioned yet ... >> > So far I don't see how... Virtual would mean that the same functionality is > provided by different packages, and that they can be exchanged at runtime. > However, for rpc there are different library *names* (sonames) to be linked, > and for nls the soversion is different... Even if the headers were identical, > that wouldnt work :/ > Gotcha, thanks for the explanation. So you'd even need a common API (header, etc) to be able to do some fudgery linking the lib names even.
MJE
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
