On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > R0b0t1 posted on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:27:35 -0500 as excerpted: > > >> I actually really like the ux-* idea. So much so I wish I'd thought of > >> it. =:^) It doesn't come across as nearly as "tired and worn out" as > >> "gui-*" does, here (tho I already see a reply from someone else with > >> the opposite reaction, favoring desktop-* over ux-*). >
Pedants will note that UI (user interface) and UX (user experience) are different things and for the described purpose of package categories, neither one fits, at all. ui-apps: Don't all "apps" have UIs, whether X11, Wayland, ncurses, slang, plain text, or etc.? ux-apps: What does this even mean? UX refers to the way a user interacts with an application, not the application itself.
