On 07/27/2017 03:52 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On śro, 2017-07-26 at 19:17 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 07/25/2017 10:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> ** <kbd>Fixes: <nowiki>https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN</nowiki></kbd>;; — >>> to indicate a fixed bug, >> >> At this point fixes is overloading >>> ** <kbd>Fixes: commit-id (commit message)</kbd> — to indicate fixing a >>> previous commit >> >> This use should be forbidden. > > ...because? But sure, you don't like it, let's remove it. Not that > anyone will actually prefer the things from the GLEP over anything else. >
Because it overloads the tag for multiple meanings and as such should be different tags, we already have a tag that specifies the bug (namely Bug, presuming we use Reference: for URL specification of relevant upstream information or other discussions) >>> ** <kbd>Bug: <nowiki>https://bugs.gentoo.org/NNNNNN</nowiki></kbd>;; — to >>> reference a bug, >> >> See other comments in thread wrt Gentoo-Bug. >> >>> ** <kbd>Closes: <nowiki>https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/NNNN</nowi >>> ki></kbd>; — to automatically close a GitHub pull request, >> >> Is this a generic tag for any pull request of any platform? > > No. As I've told multiple times already, there are *no* generic tags. It > just happens to be used by some random platforms. Some others use e.g. > 'Fixes' which you forbade. > Isn't that the point of having a GLEP to begin with? Trying to standardize the use of e.g the tags so that it has a consistent meaning and can be useful? -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
