On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:36:11 -0500 > Ben Kohler <bkoh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which checks >> them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's significantly >> more complex to check for. >> >> As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave like >> -c, when you could just be using -c instead. > > No I simply want warnings like that exist for profiles and set packages. > > Also more information when attempting to remove a package that is not > removed.
Well, as was pointed out, doing that comes at a performance cost. Would it not make sense to have an option to skip dependency checks for use in scripts/etc where you know it is safe to do so? -- Rich
