On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:47:41 +0100
Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> So the only real consumer is GHDL -- yet another case when someone
> thought it'd be fun to use a fringe language to implement something
> useful... However, it seems to be undermaintained in Gentoo as well,
> not bumped for a long time.
> 

Undermaintained perhaps, but it works. Not a lot of bugs filed. Would a
pull request be sufficient to stop this package I use from being
steamrollered into oblivion? I honestly wasn’t hoping to spend my
holidays learning how the GCC build system works, but if I’m left with
no other choice, then I possibly might look into it. I won’t bother
though if there’s some reason why it wouldn’t be accepted anyway,
because people don’t want Gnat or GHDL in the tree.
-- 
Christopher Head

Attachment: pgpz_Xk5oibPC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to