>>>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Kent Fredric wrote: >> I would assume 9999 to be high enough, even if you use multiples of >> 100 to label the slot. Or do you expect having more than 100 slots >> for Perl?
> Well, the desire is for the -r<x> (or similar) part correspond to > something representative of which version of Perl the virtual is an > "underwriter" for. This would contradict existing policy already, which says that the revision component must not be used for upstream versions: https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html Ulrich
pgpDMGIHGCCLH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
