On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> 1. Revision number must be no longer than 9999:
> 1a. to make <=X-r9999 reliable,
> 1b. to prevent pathological uses of revision as date.
>

Let's just hope nobody starts using tex version numbering and so on.
Dates might be used in cases where upstream doesn't publish sane
revisions (in fact, texlive versions are dates, albeit at the year
level).

I'm not saying this isn't a good idea, I just could see where it might
crash into reality at some point.

-- 
Rich

Reply via email to