-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Am Montag, 15. August 2016, 15:03:08 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
> On 08/15/2016 02:49 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Kent Fredric <ken...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> This sort of stuff makes me feel bugzilla is entirely the wrong platform
> >> for handling stabilizations and keywords :/
> > 
> > I very much agree; some kind of minimal web app/API would probably be
> > better.
> 
> Could you please elaborate a bit? In particular from perspective of (i)
> integration into current workflow, (ii) complexity in application
> maintenance/hosting (iii) cost/benefit considerations

I agree that BZ is not the best platform for stabilizations (and keywording). 
(It's the one we have now, anything else creates maintenance.)

Now, if we want to come up with radical solutions...

1) Stabilization is a simpler and much more formalized process compared to 
normal bug resolution.
* There is one version to be stabilized. 
* Stabilization can be blocked by bugs of that version.
* If there are no blocking bugs, stabilization can go ahead.
Which means 
* No requirement for free-text fields
* One precise package version
Of course this does not handle the more complex cases like perl/gnome stable 
lists.

2) *If* we introduce a "Fixed-in" and maybe an "Introduced-in" field in 
Bugzilla, which gives a precise $CATEGORY/$PVR where a problem is resolved or 
introduced, the extraction of fixed or non-fixed bugs might even be 
automatized. 

- -- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=OtNn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to