-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 16/06/16 09:39, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I guess what I mean is these outside developers could continue > hacking and/or breaking things, or whatever else, without worrying > about their "official" branch. We could have a standard that > assumes Gentoo pulls their 'master' branch and they keep other > stuff in 'dev', or some other model. We'll need to decide on *some* > branch, but putting it in writing would make things clearer for > prospective repo maintainers. OK, then I think that it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-ci branch, or similar, if the assumption is merely that this is where Gentoo developers will look when evaluating your repository.
- -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXYlpqAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B2G0P+wZ3Ol3AmhhsOFns7Jor7wJD d9wqlLqtTeMcMEfUfYunpD02KwepN0UFN8imIqOGIHBM4IgQsvq19ejDgguh/MK3 uQxuyLWEHMhVNBRjNz6Ngm0IPx/3XaCSJPSu0RZdkCkHcOmAHisQY0Vy4NZj3MdL JgBWSO5UA+CdOzC8t+TuyPE7+nt4fgC1sCwyPbjFMeD2A5IAtmyJ1hvW+THf0LeC BW3tKt3SVLvbRLFV1A4kpKQJ+geG6+6t24jeqYrKkcViTaL5YSoAPNfajmYobXyE zK7q+jN33WrwcOkUQGwWGg15D7/aGN5HzeJp6IGu6ANx+Ya+IVN/nG6ZpCdj569x eeIKvNsFC7KNE6IV0srXQHKZbz9W7cAadX/vxyWHRxOwsYRQ5ZrxJH+gq6V5yeOf 0jHiT75xLCHkzk8jyKAFvou8YkLV4e9HnNd0R4Yub77hYUrS8kJ/XGRe2pEW9UrC eMli1kiEdJ4rwI+E62kPpPqSpm17MGsdylFNav/2j4EW7g8l/ez+7LT1kOSY8ywW JPSPiB53WHDDrnkn0y8Ips/sygu+8brTyu10SoNXSOHKZF2ZYUNXBOUunK3fqahb zxrnzIAu8e5BD97+YgxSbg284lleUqkSdZP5O7DaNEpSMcEo9yOv1kLYNsD1vGH/ mGYOXf0F5wti+uGJxjoH =bQST -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
