-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 16/06/16 09:24, Daniel Campbell wrote: > To touch on the user repo part.. can't it be as simple as adding > one requirement to user repos that wish to be considered as > curated? > > Create a "gentoo-ci" branch or something else, and the maintainer > of each repo can update said branch when QA 'approves' a given > commit. Then others can 'subscribe' to that branch and development > remains unhindered by the QA process in a distributed format. I'm not sure what you mean by unhindered. I didn't mean for my idea to create any hindrance. My idea was to fork their repository, and have some dev(s) take the responsibility of merging from the user. Or, we could do what Exherbo does, just let them carry on and trust them, and only (perhaps temporarily) remove their repository if we find them guilty of some wrongdoing.
While I'm not axiomatically opposed to your idea, I think it may create noise if everybody makes a gentoo-ci branch, and most of them are close to worthless. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXYla5AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BjQAP/jfWOmR3DHMSlUpYGQILCrRp na0WUIHqWqVFirb5UaG4Jn419TXvHynT7WqeP1brL/czWiwZ/XO7IUF/Qw2Qbg29 uXtFS03V+KvnJSZNHBuY9yAsruKtv41fbRF906Erxo9KDoubJRlJdYoIazjwCA4a TMvFcAwLhvU0eJ+kXxZHzBWO5JSH29HA9Nwikd7vSDLZEGoB1wjjzKb2eNsU60Pg NBW7osLk7LPB+Lmqisjs/EmHJobrVCdpPl1495b/X9/I433v3Y6FE4JZQ3msclv9 aZmqAFa6nqE3Sy6bEdOJPFk7ThnS3rNU0B0hpDt4V8wG4pNRMSdW30ua3KojfcIZ Gbk77onNR8UiJNKiwW042DgZhn6ne1+19BtMQ+C9AT+5bAlnWrTPykcf+pbNfejK W4V8hIcFsus8Umug/uqxugTbtROyRCAZlll3eYLsi6NaWs16iJhJRGc1KOYwlnDJ DBO6quTK1EHGbugWPERKxMdRDikum7RnQCZYXjiYOqJI+MgReArMjqihpM9teKTL c1DUF2u8yVSxftLaClmva95wFmcbdbdWnfXVA5w1QhLeIYC+ptGUKJhV35FInTn2 Hcig2gtHZibCujBikSxsXcWigQlIzjDAtsX+lxZfa9jWwTD2b3x1ny4UQKHsA4Qi Qd5mUTzBM/1csYZtRlue =u0jJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
