Consus wrote:
> This is how overlays work right now. What are suggesting to change?

Technically not a lot in terms of how packages get installed.

It's more about offering support and/or visibility for overlays.

So technically it's about hosting user repos, making the ebuilds
within easily discoverable, and simplifying their consumption.

I would personally be super happy to have my overlay hosted at Gentoo -
not because I can't host it myself - but because that would be a lovely
recognition and a great way to get more visibility and thus more help
with the packages that I've made more or less serious attempts at
packaging.

Usually they are less seriuos attemps, otherwise I would proxymaint
them, but they are good enough for me, so maybe for someone else as
well, even though they may be totally incomplete e.g. as far as USE
flags go.

(This is true for ebuilds in gentoo too, but I would never want my
name on something like that for the actual tree; I want to deliver
higher quality there, and until I have time to do so the half-assed
ebuilds stay in my overlay. They wouldn't get included anyway, and
they shouldn't.)


//Peter

Reply via email to