On Fri, 20 May 2016 12:15:36 -0400 Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 11:44 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > I'd make '@' signify group names, like we do for sets. This would have > > the side limitation that it would make it impossible to filter > > filenames starting with '@' with the currently supported > > path-or-filename syntax. > > > > That may be the best we can do, but in that case it's only fair to > mention the exception in the GLEP. I know you don't want implementation > details in there, but if *nobody* can come up with an implementation > that doesn't invalidate some well-defined paths, then we should > weasel-word the spec so that we don't wind up with zero fully-compliant > package managers =) That's not a case since GLEP doesn't define how it is configured. And it's invalid to reference other groups in path=s of a defined group. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpT4XLOs7vpU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
