On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:34:52 -0600 William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:50:38PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2016 15:47, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > > On 2/14/16 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > the bring up of the daemon itself is not nearly as important as > > > > the runtime interaction of people using libudev or rules being > > > > executed. > > > > > > correct and i've been careful with libudev. > > > > > > anyhow, can we divert this away from udev/eudev. mike what do you > > > recommend as the future of openrc once systemd-udev can no longer > > > be extracted. > > > > if/when systemd-udev can't be extract anymore, then sys-fs/udev is > > dead, and this whole thread is fairly moot. > > -mike > > +1. > > And, as for right now, udev-229 is in the tree, so udev can still be > extracted and run standalone from systemd. and even with that, I don't think there is anything preventing using systemd-udev from an openrc boot, is it ? (ie, have systemd installed but booting with openrc)
