On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Ah, I think I see what you mean now. That's actually a bit more
> predictable and requires less action on behalf of the user. I'd like
> to add that, if we do this, could Portage output which USE flags were
> being automatically added? We already have USE changes indicated with
> the % suffix, would that be enough in your opinion?

It might not hurt to have portage display some kind of prefix that
means the flag is enabled implicitly.  That could be useful whether it
is changing or not.

In any case, none of this will happen unless somebody builds it.  :)

Maybe toss in mix-in support while we're at it.  :)

-- 
Rich

Reply via email to