On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > Well, if we're going to force it to be in the stage3, I guess this > > boils down to whether eudev or udev is the better nano. > > "Nicht alles was hinkt ist ein Vergleich", as we say in German. > Emacs has a flexible extension language, whereas nano uses a > configuration file. Not sure in which direction this would map to > OpenRC and systemd. > > > I think it makes far more sense to just remove some of the controversy > > by taking it out of the system set first. Then I doubt anybody would > > notice the switch. > > Take what out of the system set? virtual/udev isn't there, in the > first place, and virtual/dev-manager is needed for a working system.
A boot loader is also needed for a working system, but we do not have one in @system. Instead, we direct the user to choose one. William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
