As one of the maintainers of sys-fs/udev, I am very conflicted about this. I tend to agree with Kent that we need to be absolutely sure before we switch the default that eudev will maintain feature parity with udev, now and in the future, e.g. when a new release of udev hits, a new release of eudev must happen asap that supports all of the features of the new udev.
I also think mgorny's arguments against doing this must be considered. Thanks, William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
