On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:12:05 -0500 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 2/8/16 4:25 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:08:22 +0100 > > Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> Ohey, > >> > >> I've opened a bug at: > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573922 > >> > >> The idea here is to change the order of the providers of virtual/udev. > >> For existing installs this has zero impact. > >> For stage3 this would mean that eudev is pulled in instead of udev. > >> > >> The rationale behind this is: > >> > >> * eudev is an in-house fork, and there's more than a dozen distros > >> already using it by default that are not us. Which is a little bit > >> weird ... > >> > >> * Both udev and eudev have pretty much feature parity, so there won't > >> be any user-visible changes > >> > >> * udev upstream strongly discourages standalone udev (without systemd) > >> since at least 2012 > >> > >> (see for example: > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-June/005516.html > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/618 > >> ) > >> > >> So it'd be (1) following upstreams recommendations and (2) dogfooding > >> our own tools. I don't see any downsides to this :) > >> > > > > +1 > > > > I switched to eudev a few years ago and glad I did. > > > > The non-systemd profiles should have eudev as default. > > > > just pile the pressure on :)
+1 I use eudev on all setups (both home and work) for years now. The experience is yummy. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpn2VWX5rjNl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
