>>>>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 20-12-2015 a las 13:13 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: >> I think we should end this discussion here. Let the eclass >> maintainer decide what approach (if any) he wants to adopt.
> I prefer to keep the original behavior as ulm patch did :| Pushed.
pgpHmeLB1nz9g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
