El dom, 20-12-2015 a las 13:13 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: > > > > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Besides, the "set -f" code in the eclass works just fine and has > > > been tested for several years by now. > > > Sure. Relying on implicit word splitting which is a side effect of > > unquoted variable use, along with disabling side effects of that > > use > > is not a hack. On the other hand, using built-in dedicated to word > > splitting is. Of course. > > > While at it, please make sure to remove all uses of 'find -print0' > > hack. I'm pretty sure you can find some implicit ugly side effect > > that could allow us to do the same after mangling a few shopts. > > So, you don't get things exactly in your style, and then other dev's > code is an "ugly hack" and uses "side effects". Even if the code in > question causes no problems whatsoever and uses standard well > documented shell features. > > I think we should end this discussion here. Let the eclass maintainer > decide what approach (if any) he wants to adopt. > > Ulrich
I prefer to keep the original behavior as ulm patch did :|
