On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:11:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
> I honestly don't see the point of this when `git log` or even `git
> diff` or standard `diff` will tell you if what's in your overlay
> differs from the source. With some bash magic it could even be
> automated. The point of that 'feature' is to see what, if anything,
> has changed between one's overlay and Gentoo's running tree. A diff
> would not only be able to tell you *if* anything changed, but also
> *what*, without adding around 5-7 extra bytes per ebuild. Sure, it's
> only bytes, but when multiplied against the number of ebuilds we have,
> it can make a few hundred KB difference. When expanded, that number
> multiplies. Is it worth adding this extra bloat to something that a
> standard utility can expose better than a hash?

Agree here. Also I don't like the idea of post-modifying content of
signed commits: files developers committed to the tree should be
the same users get. As a side effect this will simplify tree
consistency checks and forensics.

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko

Attachment: pgp6Wh2tmBHb9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to