On 08/10/2015 02:51 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> This is not a matter of going l33t, this is a matter of getting rid >> of redundant and pretty much useless data all the same through >> almost all commit messages. > > +1 > > "Gentoo-Bug: 123456" or even "Bug: 123456" is enough to uniquely > identify a bug. Also it is easier to read (and to type) than its URL > equivalent. >
So, would this replace the bug number reference in the summary? Should we tell people to reference the bug only in the commit message description? Or do we say: * bug number in summary optional * bug number in description mandatory via "Gentoo-Bug: 1234"
