On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:39:01PM -0400, Brian Evans wrote: > Can support be added for a run/finish log script? > Should be no big deal to add what amounts to > > doexe $(s6_get_servicedir)/$name/log > newexe run-s6 run > > Otherwise i may just cheat and use $name/log as the name on a second > call since the eclass does not do any $name validation.
I'm open to it, I'm just not sure how I would make it happen since the
finish script for the service itself is optional. For example:
s6_install_service service script-1 script-2
In the above, script-2 is optional and could either be the finish script
for ${service} or the run script for ${service}/log, which is a service
itself.
The only way I can think of to allow service and log service
installation at the same time would be to use a reserved value such as
"none" to indicate that a script should be skipped. If I did that, to
install a run script and a log run script might look like:
s6_install_service service run-script none log-run-script
If you have a finish script, the call would be:
s6_install_service service run-script finish-script log-run-script
For either of these calls, there would also be an optional final
argument which would be the log-finish-script.
The tradeoff here would be that whatever I choose to indicate that a
script is skipped can't be used as a file name.
What do you think?
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
