On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Please explain this proposal in more detail. If code review is > supposed to be mandatory for each commit, this will effectively stop > development. If it is supposed to be used as an auxiliary but > not mandatory tool, e.g. when people are unsure of their changes or > need to review proxy-maintained commits and so on, I fully support > this idea.
I believe the proposal was for this to be purely optional. As such I completely support it (though I think we should consider just using the -dev-help list if it is still functional). No argument that trying to change the overall workflow needs great care. If anything it would be useful to see how optional use of a review workflow works out and maybe learn from that. -- Rich
