-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 20/10/14 06:58 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/20/14 04:23, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 20/10/14 08:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it since
>>> it breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system.
>> Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it
>> {+yet+} since it breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional
>> system.
>
> Yes. Eventually we'll have to clear the road for this. However,
> I don't think we'll ever want to support a mixed abi system.
>
Can we, even? Would it be a mixed-abi system or a multi-abi system?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlRFVgwACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDYwD+JWeZv7wu0Ot4VmTUJ1pzLxzq
K/vRu9vBd+oYLzZLMm0A/1VMtKXCY5yD3pRJJKMB+Wx+g/1jN7XblluM1IIfrlNK
=1uAG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
