On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Diamond <diam...@hi-net.ru> wrote: > Lets assume, that I don't want to scrap old ebuild yet. There's no git > cp command. git mv is just git rm + git add. That's what does it look > like (usual revbump with git add in reality): > https://github.com/cerebrum/dr/commit/311df9b04d876f5847416fe5ba699edfab50adb6 > I think that git (at least with default config is a pain in the ass for > packages at all and we should probably think about better platform for > portage). >
What would you propose? The problem you raise is just as much an issue with cvs. I don't get a continuous history across revbumps in cvs today, so I don't really see a problem with moving to git. -- Rich