On 9 August 2014 09:39, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: > *AND* (just to tie this back) it's unlikely that this is going to > actually help the original issue posted, ie, reducing the amount of > dependency updates being done "unnecessarily" on a system, or making > blind/automated system updates (of the type mentioned in the thread) > less susceptible to system breakage. >
Yeah, if anything, that system is more likely to isolate previously unknown incompatibilities, establish *tighter* dependency ranges in order to satisfy them, and require *more* revision bumps and require you to update much more than you already do. So careful what you wish for :) -- Kent *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
