-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/08/14 05:33 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > [ Snip! ] - Somebody has to implement this technology - That > requires time and effort - People have to be convinced of its > value - Integration must happen at some level somehow somewhere in > the portage toolchain(s) - People must opt in to this technology in > order for the reports to happen - And only then can this start to > deliver meaningful results. >
*AND* (just to tie this back) it's unlikely that this is going to actually help the original issue posted, ie, reducing the amount of dependency updates being done "unnecessarily" on a system, or making blind/automated system updates (of the type mentioned in the thread) less susceptible to system breakage. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlPlQ58ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAXawEAplg4MCOXTmY+MxJ4FpCYLnJ8 j/ETs84sy7MreBlWHaEA/jH8dEyJlQ8QAnJDftxmgiySwogdBweYQgaL6gPkxJTJ =Unnd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
