В Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:42:24 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> пишет:
> > On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) > > Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > >> hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. > >>> when subslots are in use) > >> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. > > Yes they are. > > We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision > bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] > to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev > Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at > http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, > nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode > Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related > packages, simple-scan and something else As Michał already noted in this thread, dynamic deps does not play nice with slot operators. So I had the same problem with "2 GNOME related packages": !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: virtual/udev:0 (virtual/udev-208-r2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >=virtual/udev-171:0/0=[gudev] required by (media-video/cheese-3.12.2::gentoo, installed) virtual/udev:0/0=[gudev] required by (x11-misc/colord-1.2.1::gentoo, installed) (virtual/udev-215::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by =virtual/udev-215 required by (games-util/xboxdrv-0.8.5-r1::gentoo, installed) (and 22 more with the same problem) > > So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. > > People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take > those races anyday over an regression that causes > endless rebuilding... > > - Samuli > -- Alexander Tsoy
