>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote: > Using an extension like -rX.Y seems odd; at the very least, I think > an incremental variable or something along that line in the ebuild > would work better.
It would also account for changes in eclasses, which any scheme bound to the ebuild's filename cannot do. > This allows for array usage like VERSION[dependencies]=1, thus > allowing other variables to be dynamic as well; you compare that > number against the one in the vdb, bingo... Taking this one step further, I wonder if one couldn't directly compare *DEPEND in the ebuild against the one in the VDB. Why would one need to introduce another variable? Ulrich
pgp5oc8HAFva1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
