On 22/07/14 10:25, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 7/21/14, 11:52 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> 2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense.
> +1 I also think it's the best option.
>
>

Not before someone has implemented an alternative way to avoid useless
rebuilding.
The quality of the distribution doesn't improve by killing one of the
most important
features the package manager has.
The quality of the distribution improves by providing an alternative
with less problems.

Sounds like to me, that the people who want to remove the feature so
badly, are the
ones volunteering for the job as well.

- Samuli

Reply via email to