On July 22, 2014 11:25:05 AM CEST, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: >El mar, 22-07-2014 a las 10:32 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand escribió: >[...] >> I find it somewhat curious that the difference between ~arch and >> stable hasn't been brought up in this discussion yet. IMHO a user on >> ~arch should expect a higher number of rebuilds, it _is_ after all >> testing, whereby at the point it reaches stable, the deps are >> hopefully more likely to be correct to begin with. >> >> Does anyone have any insight into where these changes most often >occur? >> > >Well, I have seen multiple times of this kind of fixes being noticed by >people running really old stable boxes. They notice them when they >update to latest stable and, then, we need to fix depends raising the >versions usually :/ > >Maybe this discussion should be focused on trying to think about how to >standardize a way for distinguish between revision bumps needing full >rebuild or only VDB updates :|
As someone who regularly adds in dependencies without bumping (adding USE=selinux dependencies to the proper SELinux policy) because that would trigger lots of totally unnecessary rebuilds: +1 Wkr, Sven -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
