On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 06:55:54 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 08/07/14 19:17, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal... > >> I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, > >> but 1. and 2. should definately > >> stay as is. > > What authority does the game team have over anything? Did it get > > special blessing from the Council? Isn't it just another regular > > project as per GLEP 39? > > Not everything we have had since-always-standing is documented, > unfortunately -- games has always been special from others > Still, even if it's undocumented, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist If it would have special blessing, it would be documented in one of the Council logs and/or summaries; that is about the only way it can receive it, apart from a large scale thread showing the same wide agreement. > [...] confusions with newer people... Ironically; my first Portage tree action "add a directory" got a "don't throw [expletive] into [games category]" reply, before adding the ebuild. One really can't expect new people to start to address a team like that prior to addition; I've assumed for some time that contacting the teams is a necessity before addition of an ebuild, but that quickly turned out to be false for most if not all other teams. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
