Dnia 2014-06-30, o godz. 17:40:16
James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> napisał(a):

> I've read that some heavy users of db, such as sks, work better with 5.3
> than they did with older versions.  But upgrading needs to be done with care.
> 
> So it should be fine to unmask 5.3 and slowly update reverse
> dependencies to depend on 5.3 instead of whichever 4.x they currently
> demand.
> 
> Unmasking the earlier 5.x releases seems unnecessary, though.

While at it, please don't unmask <5.3.28-r1 (EAPI<5 ebuilds). Multilib
relies heavily on not having anything EAPI<5 over 4.8.30-r1.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to