On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM, William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > All, > > Rich Freeman asked, in another thread, for specific examples of old > package.mask entries that just have "masked for testing" as the > description. > > Here is what I found with a quick look through package.mask. These > should be cleaned up by either 1) removing the mask or 2) booting the > affected packages or versions from the tree. >
Or 3) Improve the mask message. For example, I think the major reason for the sys-libs/db mask is a weird licensing issue. It's still nice to have it in the tree.
