On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:40 +0200
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 24/03/2014 02:43, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:47:22 +0200
> > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Tags work best when they describe narrow, clearly defined
> >> attributes, and the thing they are applied to can have one, two or
> >> more of these attributes or sometimes even none. Music and movie
> >> genres are an excellent example - there are only so many of them
> >> and for the most part one can tell whether a tag really is a genre
> >> or not.
> > 
> > There are more ways to search for a music or a movie than a genre:
> 
> Genre was just one example of tag usage for illustration. Doesn't mean
> there aren't other equally good or valid examples.

+1 Ah, in that case, what I've said backs up your thought. \o/
 
> > We could make a list of types (some already mentioned above) and a
> > list of possible tags for that type to shape the tag system
> > somewhat.
> 
> Have you considered just how much heavy lifting that is? Who is going
> to compile the list of tags?

+1 Yes, it's why I've stated before this should be crowd sourced.

> Who is going to approve/disapprove tagable attributes and the tags
> themselves?

Approval by default (with a quick skim over it) where we disapprove
what's not appropriate once we spot it could work. The "tagging rules"
will make themselves here. Those whom are interested could do it; that
is, I'd expect Alec to help out a bit, maybe I do too, maybe others?

> How will you resolve disagreements people have?

Discussion and/or votes.

> What about the case of a package maintainer that simply can't be
> bothered doing tags at all?

+1 [see crowd sourced idea]

> I'm not against tagging per se, they can be useful.

+1, same thought; it's nice to have, but it needs to be good to work.

> But they do have to be strictly controlled otherwise things get out
> of hand very quickly. Every case I've seen of software that uses a
> freeform tagging mechanism fails almost instantly as it becomes very
> inconsistent. I have one of these apps in a corporate setting right
> now, have you any idea how many ways people can come up with to tag
> the concept of "cloud"? I have tags in there where someone translated
> the word "cloud" to a different language! It sounded like a good idea
> at the time to them....
> 
> All in all, tagging is a huge amount of work and the odds of failure
> are high. People need to be aware of this reality.

+1 As can be seen that it can be made to work with things like movie
and music recommendation; it indeed took a while till they got at that
point, doing the work right avoids us to spend too much time on this.

> Wyatt Epp's post at 03:25 expresses very nicely in a more formal
> language what I'm saying.

+1

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Reply via email to