On 28/02/14 17:24, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 08:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an
>> ebuild, if user hasn't
>> set otherwise.
>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is
>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d"
>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}"
>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself
>> in the foot
>>
>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to
>> make that happen w/
>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a
>> feature request bug?
>>
> What would be the purpose? Can you give me a use case.
>
I already did, earlier in this thread. Please refer to it.
