Lars Wendler wrote: > >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd > >> crap. > > > >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. > > Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than > being uselessly integrated into systemd whereas it can still work on > its own with no whatsoever relation to systemd. But yes, totally > childish...
I wouldn't say childish but it doesn't seem too useful to me. It seems clear (at least to me) that even if there isn't so tight integration of udev with systemd today it's reasonable to expect that there will be tight integration in the soonish future, as upstream continues to move in the direction they like. There's nothing wrong per se with a future udev ebuild which applies a mega-patch onto systemd sources in order to get udevd standalone but I think that's probably not the most useful contribution you can make to Gentoo, Lars. Of course in the end you should work on what you like, but in your place I would probably focus on something else, probably eudev. //Peter
pgpQgPMMH6pdN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
