-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 13/01/14 09:46 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström" > <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote: > >> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but again I'm >> not sure it's a game changer for users. > > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools > can query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them > with a different package manager.
..you mean, define the API and include it in PMS? how much bureaucracy will that need to occur? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlLT/o0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBIlwD/UhmM7jiu0c3kbczm/p0eA0nE QklKzRWkYxLpUpWEwegA/0GzTsFmUL/9C+xVvh1rpKjk23L6LAR/mWuiB34Vmnb0 =vpX0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
