On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström" <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote:
> At the end of the day we have one codebase which is > "engineered" and another which has "evolved". Too broad generalization, too much assumption; both can be held as meaning nothing compared to what "engineered" and "evolved" could really be, but as with doing that, it gets a subjective nature. In other words, the lack of context makes this statement meaningless. What we're looking for is a well-engineered _and_ well-evolving distribution, not just a well-engineered _or_ well-evolving package; and thus there's a lot more to it to really use this as an argument. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
