Dnia 2013-09-13, o godz. 19:16:06
William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> OpenRC currently has a public api, consisting of librc and libeinfo
> (rc.h and einfo.h are the headers); however, I do not know of any
> released software that uses these, so, if there is nothing, I am
> considering making this code private to OpenRC and getting rid of the
> API.

I won't oppose since I don't use OpenRC anymore and therefore my
opinion doesn't really matter here. However, I can't help but notice
a particular trend since Roy left the project. I see that OpenRC is
slowly regressing towards baselayout-1.

First the oldnet thingie being made the default back. While I can
understand why people wanted it so badly, this doesn't make this less
of a carousel for Gentoo users. I mean, changing defaults with every
maintainer change.

Then, functions.sh split. While itself good, I don't get what's
the benefit of converting the bash script from baselayout-1 while
a better one was provided with OpenRC.

Now removing the public API because you don't care. While it may have
been unused indeed, it's simply crippling the thing, not making it more
useful.

I'd like to see some kind of plan behind all this. Because as far as I
can see, it's just new maintainers slowly dropping all the new features
they don't care about without any specific vision. No offense intended.

If OpenRC really wants to compete with systemd, it should at least have
some design plan, and you really should start working on providing
useful features rather than reverting, crippling and rewriting for
the sake of changing things.

Just some material to think about.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to