-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/09/13 02:15 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> Out of curiosity, what is the reasoning behind making these libs >> private? > > Well, the thought has changed slightly. librc can't be made > private currently because of openrc-settingsd. libeinfo, on the > other hand, does not have any known consumers, so there is no > reason to keep it as a library.
That doesn't answer my question, though; yes at this point there's no reason to keep it public, but -why- move it to private? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlJB2EoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC8uwD+PwSGgcRI1Yv4COVjfavrbt4p tag4I4xzueXBvBBeIygA/RPCV+xnK5SHwdGluxQxPUj0Zpg4EPeeJ/+F1gpWVPC7 =cEZR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
